Efficient Database Queries in Rails: A Practical Approach
This post will walk through a step-by-step approach to PostgreSQL query enhancement in Rails applications. From indexing strategies to running migrations without downtime, to efficient column selection, you'll learn some techniques to ensure optimal query performance.
Getting Started
To get started quicker with a Rails application, schema design, and data, I've forked the Rideshare Rails application on GitHub. This is used for exercises in the book High Performance PostgreSQL for Rails. I had the opportunity to provide a technical review for the beta version of this book. Many insights shared in this post are derived from the lessons learned during that review process. If you're interested in the book, it can be purchased here.
Introducing Rideshare
Rideshare is an API-only Rails application that implements a portion of a fictional rideshare service. Think of Uber or Lyft. The core Rideshare models are Drivers, Riders, Trips, Trip Requests. The database is PostgreSQL. The schema is shown below and was generated with the rails-erd gem:
Single Table Inheritance (STI) is used to represent both Drivers and Riders in the Users table. This means that rows where users.type = 'Driver' are Drivers, and can be joined to Trips on driver_id. Rows where users.type = 'Rider' are Riders, and can be joined to TripRequests on rider_id.
Here are the corresponding model classes, only focusing on the associations between them:
class User < ApplicationRecord
end
class Trip < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :trip_request
belongs_to :driver, class_name: 'User'
has_many :trip_positions
delegate :rider, to: :trip_request, allow_nil: false
end
class Location < ApplicationRecord
end
class TripRequest < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :rider, class_name: 'User'
belongs_to :start_location, class_name: 'Location'
belongs_to :end_location, class_name: 'Location'
has_one :trip
endGenerating Data
Rideshare comes with a task to generate sample data bin/rails data_generators:generate_all. I've modified it to generate 1000 Drivers and Riders, and 50,000 Trips and Trip Requests. I've also modified it to generate random variability in the trips.completed_at date from anywhere between 1 and 90 days ago. The data generator can be re-run at any time, but first run the truncate task bin/rails db:truncate_all to quickly remove all data.
While generating fake data for testing purposes can provide a valuable simulation of a sizeable database, seeded data tends to be very efficiently laid out, sequentially. This results in an unrealistically high number of rows in fewer pages. When the data is packed so efficiently, performance can be good for sequential scans. An equivalent range of data that grew and churned organically in production over time via INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE, statements will result in a more dispersed distribution of data across pages.
Therefore, when addressing a specific performance issues encountered in a production database, it might be necessary to replicate the environment in a test setup, by copying relevant portions of production data to a separate testing environment. This may also require anonymizing sensitive data during the copy process. The High Performance PostgreSQL for Rails book goes through this exercise with an example users table.
However, for the purpose of this blog post, we'll be focused on optimizing a query to meet a new business requirement, so we don't need to worry about the complexities of a live environment.
Building an Admin Report
We have a business requirement to create a dashboard type view for the admin team that manages Rideshare. They would like to have a view that shows recently completed trips. Each trip should display:
- Trip completed date
- Rating given by the rider
- Driver that provided the trip
- Rider that took the trip
- Location where the trip started
Being an API-only application, we will only focus on the query part of this logic, and assume a separate front end application will take care of rendering the report.
First Attempt
Before getting into the complexity of joins to get all the data, let's first focus on the main requirement, which is to show recently completed trips. We can use the completed_at timestamp column on the Trip model in a scope as follows:
class Trip < ApplicationRecord
scope :recently_completed, -> {
where('completed_at >= ?', 1.week.ago)
}
# ...
endLet's try this out in a Rails console bin/rails c
results = Trip.recently_completed
# SELECT "trips"."id", "trips"."trip_request_id", "trips"."driver_id", "trips"."completed_at", "trips"."rating", "trips"."created_at", "trips"."updated_at"
# FROM "trips" WHERE (completed_at >= '2024-01-10 12:29:18.260820')
results.length
# => 559
results.first.attributes
# =>
# {"id"=>6011,
# "trip_request_id"=>6031,
# "driver_id"=>61038,
# "completed_at"=>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 07:12:42.960652000 CST -06:00,
# "rating"=>nil,
# "created_at"=>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:12:42.960652000 CST -06:00,
# "updated_at"=>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 07:12:42.960652000 CST -06:00}In development mode, the console output displays the SQL query that ActiveRecord generated when the scope was executed. To understand the efficiency of this query, we need to view the query execution plan. To do this, launch a database console with bin/rails dbconsole and then enter the SQL query that was generated by ActiveRecord, preceded by the EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) command at the psql prompt:
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT "trips"."id"
, "trips"."trip_request_id"
, "trips"."driver_id"
, "trips"."completed_at"
, "trips"."rating"
, "trips"."created_at"
, "trips"."updated_at"
FROM "trips"
WHERE (completed_at >= '2024-01-10 12:29:18.260820');-- QUERY PLAN
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Seq Scan on trips (cost=0.00..1106.00 rows=3521 width=48) (actual time=0.013..11.413 rows=3863 loops=1)
-- Filter: (completed_at >= '2024-01-04 12:20:54.270716'::timestamp without time zone)
-- Rows Removed by Filter: 46137
-- Planning Time: 1.193 ms
-- Execution Time: 11.880 msIn PostgreSQL, the EXPLAIN statement is used to analyze and show the execution plan of a SQL query. It shows how the database engine is planning to execute the query, such as which indexes will be used and estimated costs. The cost is a unit-less value representing the estimated computational effort required for the operation. Lower values are generally better.
While EXPLAIN can be run on its own, its typically used together with the ANALYZE option. This option tells PostgreSQL to actually execute the query, so the output will include statistics such as the number of rows processed, and execution time.
From the output above we can see that a sequential scan was performed to retrieve rows from the trips table:
Seq Scan on trips (cost=0.00..1106.00 rows=3521 width=48) (actual time=0.013..11.413 rows=3863 loops=1)It also shows that the query took nearly 12 ms to execute, which is relatively slow for such a simple query:
Execution Time: 11.880 msA sequential scan means that PostgreSQL reads the entire table, and then filters the rows out that match the query conditions. The number of rows removed by filtering are shown in the execution plan:
Filter: (completed_at >= '2024-01-04 12:20:54.270716'::timestamp without time zone)
Rows Removed by Filter: 46137To understand why a slow sequential scan is being used to filter trips rows based on completed_at, we can take a look at the trips table schema. Still in the database console, the \d table_name meta-command can be used to display any table schema:
=> \d trips
Table "rideshare.trips"
Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
-----------------+--------------------------------+-----------+----------+-----------------------------------
id | bigint | | not null | nextval('trips_id_seq'::regclass)
trip_request_id | bigint | | not null |
driver_id | integer | | not null |
completed_at | timestamp without time zone | | |
rating | integer | | |
created_at | timestamp(6) without time zone | | not null |
updated_at | timestamp(6) without time zone | | not null |
Indexes:
"trips_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"index_trips_on_driver_id" btree (driver_id)
"index_trips_on_rating" btree (rating)
"index_trips_on_trip_request_id" btree (trip_request_id)
Check constraints:
"chk_rails_4743ddc2d2" CHECK (completed_at > created_at) NOT VALID
"rating_check" CHECK (rating >= 1 AND rating <= 5)
Foreign-key constraints:
"fk_rails_6d92acb430" FOREIGN KEY (trip_request_id) REFERENCES trip_requests(id)
"fk_rails_e7560abc33" FOREIGN KEY (driver_id) REFERENCES users(id)The Indexes section of the output above lists all the indexes that are available on the trips table. Notice there is no index on completed_at:
Indexes:
"trips_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"index_trips_on_driver_id" btree (driver_id)
"index_trips_on_rating" btree (rating)
"index_trips_on_trip_request_id" btree (trip_request_id)While the existing query may be sufficient for the current scale, this operation will become progressively slower as the number of trips increases. This means that the overall efficiency and performance of the application may be negatively impacted over time.
Improving the scalability of the application involves optimizing queries to be less resource-intensive, and adding an index to the completed_at column, is a step towards achieving this goal. Scaling, in this context, refers to the ability of the database system to handle a growing workload efficiently. By addressing the performance bottlenecks, such as slow sequential scans, the application can better leverage the capabilities of the PostgreSQL instance as the workload increases.
So the next step in improving this query is to add an index, which can help with accessing the data at a lower cost.
Second Attempt: Add Index
To add an index to an existing table in a Rails application, start by generating a database migration:
bin/rails generate migration AddIndexToTripsCompletedAtFill in the change method, specifying what table the index should be added to, and on what column:
# db/migrate/20240111132403_add_index_to_trips_completed_at.rb
class AddIndexToTripsCompletedAt < ActiveRecord::Migration[7.1]
def change
add_index :trips, :completed_at
end
endRun the migration with bin/rails db:migrate. However, in the Rideshare application, the migration is not applied due to the following error:
Migrating to AddIndexToTripsCompletedAt (20240111132403)
== 20240111132403 AddIndexToTripsCompletedAt: migrating =======================
TRANSACTION (0.7ms) BEGIN
(1.6ms) SHOW server_version_num
(0.7ms) SET statement_timeout TO 3600000
(0.7ms) SET lock_timeout TO 10000
TRANSACTION (0.7ms) ROLLBACK
(0.8ms) SELECT pg_advisory_unlock(5537362570877065845)
bin/rails aborted!
StandardError: An error has occurred, this and all later migrations canceled: (StandardError)
=== Dangerous operation detected #strong_migrations ===
Adding an index non-concurrently blocks writes. Instead, use:
class AddIndexToTripsCompletedAt < ActiveRecord::Migration[7.1]
disable_ddl_transaction!
def change
add_index :trips, :completed_at, algorithm: :concurrently
end
endThis error is coming from the Strong Migrations gem that is included in Rideshare. This gem prevents "dangerous" migrations from being added to the project.
What makes this particular migration risky is that adding an index will lock the table that it's being added to, which means the application won't be able to read or write from/to the trips table while this migration is in progress. Since adding an index can take a long time on large tables, this will result in application errors.
Since access to the trips table is critical to the functioning of the application, we can avoid potential downtime, by following the advice generated by the Strong Migrations gem. Notice the error message included how the migration should be written. Here is the corrected version:
class AddIndexToTripsCompletedAt < ActiveRecord::Migration[7.1]
disable_ddl_transaction!
def change
add_index :trips, :completed_at, algorithm: :concurrently
end
endSpecifying algorithm: :concurrently tells PostgreSQL to add the index without locking the table. This means the trips table can continue to be queried while the index is being added, which keeps the application responsive. The trade-off with :concurrently is that it makes the operation take about twice as long.
disable_ddl_transaction! disables the transaction for DDL (Data Definition Language) statements, because the concurrent approach can't be executed inside a transaction.
With this change in place, bin/rails db:migrate completes successfully and the index is now added.
Now we can, once again, examine the execution plan for the completed trips query after adding the index:
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT "trips"."id"
, "trips"."trip_request_id"
, "trips"."driver_id"
, "trips"."completed_at"
, "trips"."rating"
, "trips"."created_at"
, "trips"."updated_at"
FROM "trips"
WHERE (completed_at >= '2024-01-10 12:29:18.260820'); QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Bitmap Heap Scan on trips (cost=67.58..592.59 rows=3521 width=48) (actual time=0.724..3.849 rows=3863 loops=1)
-- Recheck Cond: (completed_at >= '2024-01-04 12:20:54.270716'::timestamp without time zone)
-- Heap Blocks: exact=481
-- -> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_completed_at (cost=0.00..66.70 rows=3521 width=0) (actual time=0.603..0.604 --rows=3863 loops=1)
-- Index Cond: (completed_at >= '2024-01-04 12:20:54.270716'::timestamp without time zone)
-- Planning Time: 0.242 ms
-- Execution Time: 4.229 msThis time the query planner is using the index on completed_at instead of a sequential scan. This is shown with the Bitmap Index Scan which indicates that the index_trips_on_completed_at index is being used:
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_completed_at...
Index Cond: (completed_at >= '2024-01-04 12:20:54.270716'::timestamp without time zone)And the overall time to complete this query is just over 4ms, a significant improvement over the previous ~12ms when using a sequential scan:
Execution Time: 4.229 msThis is because the index allows PostgreSQL to quickly locate and retrieve the relevant rows. Specifically, the index supports a faster filtering operation based on the query conditions. Note that since this isn't an index-only scan, a Bitmap Heap Scan was still required to access data from the table, which is shown in the first line of the query plan:
Bitmap Heap Scan on trips (cost=67.58..592.59 rows=3521 width=48) (actual time=0.724..3.849 rows=3863 loops=1)Third Attempt: Joins
Now that use of completed_at is optimized, we can continue development of the admin dashboard query. Recall we also need to show driver and rider information, as well as the trip location. To do this, we'll use the ActiveRecord joins method.
To get location information, the Trip model must be joined to trip_request, which must then be joined to start_location via a nested join.
Getting rider and driver information requires joining the users table twice, once for Riders (which are joined on trip_request.rider_id), and another time for Drivers (which are joined on trips.driver_id), due to use of Single Table Inheritance that models Drivers and Riders with the same underlying users table. This requires the use of a string join rather than just specifying the model.
The same where clause as before is used to filter on recent trips.
By default, the result of the ActiveRecord joins method will only select the columns from the model class on which its invoked, Trip in this case. But since the report needs to also show Driver, Rider, and Location information, this scope adds a SELECT clause to get all fields from all tables using the ActiveRecord select method:
class Trip < ApplicationRecord
scope :recently_completed, -> {
joins(trip_request: [:start_location])
.joins("INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id")
.joins("INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id")
.where("trips.completed_at > ?", 1.week.ago)
.select("trips.*, locations.*, drivers.*, riders.*")
}
endHere is what it looks like in a Rails console. Note that even though results is a relation of Trip models, each instance contains attributes from trips, locations, and users tables. However, since both drivers and riders are actually from the same users table, the last one pulled in (riders in this case) "wins" and so the result only has the rider attributes. This is due to the order in which the attributes are selected in the SQL query and will be addressed in the next section.
I've added === comments to highlight which model each set of attributes comes from:
results = Trip.recently_completed
# Trip Load (2.5ms) SELECT trips.*, locations.*, drivers.*, riders.*
# FROM "trips" INNER JOIN "trip_requests" ON "trip_requests"."id" = "trips"."trip_request_id"
# INNER JOIN "locations" ON "locations"."id" = "trip_requests"."start_location_id"
# INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id
# INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id
# WHERE (trips.completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:20:01.192132')
results.length
# => 559
results.first.attributes
# {
# === TRIP ATTRIBUTES ===
# "id"=>61943,
# "trip_request_id"=>56017,
# "driver_id"=>60456,
# "completed_at"=>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 07:21:26.462838000 CST -06:00,
# "rating"=>5,
# === LOCATION ATTRIBUTES ===
# "address"=>"New York, NY",
# "city"=>nil,
# "state"=>"NY",
# "position"=>#<struct ActiveRecord::Point x=40.7143528, y=-74.0059731>,
# === USER AS RIDER ATTRIBUTES ===
# "first_name"=>"Shantelle",
# "last_name"=>"Kris",
# "email"=>"Shantelle-Kris-522@email.com",
# "type"=>"Rider",
# "password_digest"=>"$2a$12...",
# "trips_count"=>nil,
# "drivers_license_number"=>nil
# }Now this query can be analyzed in a database console session bin/rails dbconsole:
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT
trips.*,
locations.*,
drivers.*,
riders.*
FROM "trips"
INNER JOIN "trip_requests" ON "trip_requests"."id" = "trips"."trip_request_id"
INNER JOIN "locations" ON "locations"."id" = "trip_requests"."start_location_id"
INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id
INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id
WHERE (trips.completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:05:39.639423');-- QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Hash Join (cost=1399.44..2692.88 rows=524 width=453) (actual time=11.736..24.510 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Hash Cond: (trips.driver_id = drivers.id)
-- -> Nested Loop (cost=529.22..1821.28 rows=524 width=294) (actual time=1.109..13.507 rows=559 loops=1)
-- -> Hash Join (cost=528.93..1643.10 rows=524 width=139) (actual time=1.085..12.227 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Hash Cond: (trip_requests.start_location_id = locations.id)
-- -> Hash Join (cost=527.89..1637.76 rows=524 width=56) (actual time=1.054..11.992 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Hash Cond: (trip_requests.id = trips.trip_request_id)
-- -> Seq Scan on trip_requests (cost=0.00..917.10 rows=50010 width=16) (actual time=0.004..4.868 rows=50010 loops=1)
-- -> Hash (cost=521.34..521.34 rows=524 width=48) (actual time=1.028..1.032 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 53kB
-- -> Bitmap Heap Scan on trips (cost=12.35..521.34 rows=524 width=48) (actual time=0.116..0.896 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Recheck Cond: (completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:05:39.639423'::timestamp without time zone)
-- Heap Blocks: exact=328
-- -> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_completed_at (cost=0.00..12.22 rows=524 width=0) (actual time=0.060..0.060 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Index Cond: (completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:05:39.639423'::timestamp without time zone)
-- -> Hash (cost=1.02..1.02 rows=2 width=87) (actual time=0.019..0.021 rows=2 loops=1)
-- Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 9kB
-- -> Seq Scan on locations (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=2 width=87) (actual time=0.011..0.013 rows=2 loops=1)
-- -> Index Scan using users_pkey on users riders (cost=0.29..0.34 rows=1 width=159) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=559)
-- Index Cond: (id = trip_requests.rider_id)
-- -> Hash (cost=595.10..595.10 rows=22010 width=159) (actual time=10.601..10.601 rows=22010 loops=1)
-- Buckets: 32768 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 3221kB
-- -> Seq Scan on users drivers (cost=0.00..595.10 rows=22010 width=159) (actual time=0.021..4.849 rows=22010 loops=1)
-- Planning Time: 1.046 ms
-- Execution Time: 24.936 msThe SQL explain plan above shows this is a more complex query than the previous attempts. It includes many more operations than can be covered in this post, so we'll only be focusing on the join operations.
Execution time has gone up, even though the query is still using the index on trips.completed_at:
Execution Time: 24.936 msThis is in part due to the multiple joins. Joins between tables are expressed in the plan as a combination of a Hash node, a Hash Join which implements the join details, and a Hash Cond, which shows the conditions that were used to perform the join, using the Hash node.
For example, the join from the trips table to the trip_requests table is shown in the plan as:
-> Hash Join (cost=527.89..1637.76 rows=524 width=56) (actual time=1.054..11.992 rows=559 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (trip_requests.id = trips.trip_request_id)
-> Hash (cost=521.34..521.34 rows=524 width=48) (actual time=1.028..1.032 rows=559 loops=1)Here's a definition of the Hash Join operation from the pgMustard glossary:
An implementation of join in which one of the collections of rows to be joined is hashed on the join keys using a separate 'Hash' node. PostgreSQL then iterates over the other collection of rows, for each one looking it up in the hash table to see if there are any rows it should be joined to.
CAUTION: When using joins, there should be an index on each foreign key column. In the example above, these are: trips.trip_request_id, trip_requests.start_location_id, trip_requests.rider_id, and trips.driver_id. If you used references when generating the migration with Rails, or specified t.references :some_model, foreign_key: true in the Rails migration file, then Rails (as of 5.2) will automatically generate an index on that column in addition to the foreign key constraint. In the Rideshare schema, all foreign keys are indexed.
This version of the query is also fetching more data due to the SELECT clause specifying all columns on all tables in the joins:
.select("trips.*, locations.*, drivers.*, riders.*")Another way to improve performance is to reduce the "width" of the results.
Fourth Attempt: Reduce Columns
The previous query selected all columns from all of the joined tables. For example, each result was including user details such as password digest and drivers license number. But recall the business requirements were that we only need to display a subset of user and trip information.
Let's "narrow" the amount of data by restricting the columns in the SELECT clause to only what we need. This also supports string concatenation to distinguish between driver and rider names:
class Trip < ApplicationRecord
scope :recently_completed, -> {
joins(trip_request: [:start_location])
.joins('INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id')
.joins('INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id')
.where('trips.completed_at > ?', 1.week.ago)
.select("trips.completed_at, trips.rating, locations.address,
CONCAT(drivers.first_name, ' ', drivers.last_name) driver_name,
CONCAT(riders.first_name, ' ', riders.last_name) rider_name")
}
# ...
endRunning this query in the Rails console shows the attributes contain exactly what's needed to display in the view, with no extraneous data.
results = Trip.recently_completed
results.first.attributes
# {
# "completed_at" => Wed, 10 Jan 2024 07:12:42.960652000 CST -06:00,
# "rating" => nil,
# "address" => "New York, NY",
# "driver_name" => "Rasheeda Brakus",
# "rider_name" => "Corina Gorczany",
# "id" => nil
# }Again we can view the query execution plan:
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT
trips.completed_at,
trips.rating,
locations.address,
CONCAT(drivers.first_name, ' ', drivers.last_name) driver_name,
CONCAT(riders.first_name, ' ', riders.last_name) rider_name
FROM trips
INNER JOIN trip_requests ON trip_requests.id = trips.trip_request_id
INNER JOIN locations ON locations.id = trip_requests.start_location_id
INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id
INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id
WHERE trips.completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:27:19.062944';-- QUERY PLAN
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Hash Join (cost=1398.27..2693.98 rows=516 width=88) (actual time=8.572..20.188 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Hash Cond: (trips.driver_id = drivers.id)
-- -> Nested Loop (cost=528.05..1817.24 rows=516 width=41) (actual time=1.246..12.363 rows=559 loops=1)
-- -> Hash Join (cost=527.76..1641.78 rows=516 width=32) (actual time=1.224..11.156 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Hash Cond: (trip_requests.start_location_id = locations.id)
-- -> Hash Join (cost=526.71..1636.51 rows=516 width=24) (actual time=1.191..10.985 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Hash Cond: (trip_requests.id = trips.trip_request_id)
-- -> Seq Scan on trip_requests (cost=0.00..917.10 rows=50010 width=16) (actual time=0.005..4.199 rows=50010 loops=1)
-- -> Hash (cost=520.26..520.26 rows=516 width=24) (actual time=1.167..1.174 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 38kB
-- -> Bitmap Heap Scan on trips (cost=12.29..520.26 rows=516 width=24) (actual time=0.138..1.060 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Recheck Cond: (completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:27:19.062944'::timestamp without time zone)
-- Heap Blocks: exact=328
-- -> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_completed_at (cost=0.00..12.16 rows=516 width=0) (actual time=0.081..0.081 rows=559 loops=1)
-- Index Cond: (completed_at > '2024-01-10 12:27:19.062944'::timestamp without time zone)
-- -> Hash (cost=1.02..1.02 rows=2 width=20) (actual time=0.020..0.021 rows=2 loops=1)
-- Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 9kB
-- -> Seq Scan on locations (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=2 width=20) (actual time=0.012..0.013 rows=2 loops=1)
-- -> Index Scan using users_pkey on users riders (cost=0.29..0.34 rows=1 width=21) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=559)
-- Index Cond: (id = trip_requests.rider_id)
-- -> Hash (cost=595.10..595.10 rows=22010 width=21) (actual time=7.296..7.296 rows=22010 loops=1)
-- Buckets: 32768 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 1492kB
-- -> Seq Scan on users drivers (cost=0.00..595.10 rows=22010 width=21) (actual time=0.007..3.716 rows=22010 loops=1)
-- Planning Time: 1.649 ms
-- Execution Time: 20.553 msThis time the performance is slightly improved:
Execution Time: 20.553 msIt still needs to perform all the joins, but less overall data is being fetched from the database. This can be observed by the smaller width attribute in the Hash Join operations. The width refers to the total number of bytes required to store the output of the join operation, and is proportional to the number of columns in the SELECT clause.
For example, focusing on the top level Hash Join operation, this query has a width of 88:
Hash Join (cost=1398.27..2693.98 rows=516 width=88) (actual time=8.572..20.188 rows=559 loops=1)Whereas the previous version of the query where all columns from all tables were being retrieved shows an overall width of 453:
Hash Join (cost=1399.44..2692.88 rows=524 width=453) (actual time=11.736..24.510 rows=559 loops=1)Selecting only the necessary columns can lead to performance improvements including reduced disk I/O and smaller memory requirements.
Fifth Attempt: Reduce Rows
Another way to improve performance is to reduce the total number of rows returned by the query with additional filters (i.e. SQL WHERE clauses). This could require some discussion between engineering and product teams to make sure everyone understands the business problem that is being solved.
In this case, it turns out the Rideshare admins want to focus only on recent trips with low ratings, so they can investigate what happened on some of those trips to improve customer experience. They've defined a "low" rating as 3 or fewer stars, based on a 5 star rating system. Up until now, they've been sorting the results client side by rating, and investigating those.
Given this better understanding of the requirements, another WHERE condition can be added to the scope, to only retrieve trips where the rating is less than or equal to 3.
CAUTION: When adding further WHERE clauses to reduce the amount of data being returned, always check whether there's an index on the column you're planning to filter by. Otherwise, you could inadvertently make performance worse while trying to improve it! In this case, there already is an index on trips.rating. We saw this earlier when inspecting the table schema with \d trips in the database console:
=> \d trips
...
Indexes:
"index_trips_on_rating" btree (rating)
...Here is the modified scope adding an additional WHERE clause on trip.rating to only retrieve low ratings
class Trip < ApplicationRecord
scope :recently_completed, -> {
joins(trip_request: [:start_location])
.joins('INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id')
.joins('INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id')
.where('trips.completed_at > ?', 1.week.ago)
.where('trips.rating <= ?', 3)
.select("trips.completed_at, trips.rating, locations.address,
CONCAT(drivers.first_name, ' ', drivers.last_name) driver_name,
CONCAT(riders.first_name, ' ', riders.last_name) rider_name")
}
endThis time, the results are "shaped" the same as before because the SELECT columns are the same, but the total number of results is smaller. This also ensures the query only returns trips with ratings, as before, we were also getting results with nil ratings, i.e. where the customer didn't leave to leave a rating.
results = Trip.recently_completed
results.length
# => 78
results.first.attributes
# {
# "completed_at"=>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:07:11.312416000 CST -06:00,
# "rating"=>2,
# "address"=>"New York, NY",
# "driver_name"=>"Bobbi Cronin",
# "rider_name"=>"Anibal Hammes",
# "id"=>nil
# }Explain/analyze the query:
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT
trips.completed_at,
trips.rating,
locations.address,
drivers.first_name || ' ' || drivers.last_name AS driver_name,
riders.first_name || ' ' || riders.last_name AS rider_name
FROM trips
INNER JOIN trip_requests ON trip_requests.id = trips.trip_request_id
INNER JOIN locations ON locations.id = trip_requests.start_location_id
INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id
INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id
WHERE (trips.completed_at > '2024-01-10 13:08:58.257990')
AND (trips.rating <= 3); QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=97.88..1340.17 rows=75 width=88) (actual time=0.514..1.937 rows=78 loops=1)
Join Filter: (trip_requests.start_location_id = locations.id)
Rows Removed by Join Filter: 78
-> Seq Scan on locations (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=2 width=20) (actual time=0.012..0.015 rows=2 loops=1)
-> Materialize (cost=97.88..1336.34 rows=75 width=42) (actual time=0.247..0.937 rows=78 loops=2)
-> Nested Loop (cost=97.88..1335.96 rows=75 width=42) (actual time=0.488..1.819 rows=78 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=97.59..862.59 rows=75 width=33) (actual time=0.463..1.492 rows=78 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=97.30..837.09 rows=75 width=24) (actual time=0.449..1.240 rows=78 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on trips (cost=97.01..298.02 rows=75 width=24) (actual time=0.436..0.645 rows=78 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((completed_at > '2024-01-10 13:08:58.25799'::timestamp without time zone) AND (rating <= 3))
Heap Blocks: exact=72
-> BitmapAnd (cost=97.01..97.01 rows=75 width=0) (actual time=0.419..0.421 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_completed_at (cost=0.00..12.05 rows=501 width=0) (actual time=0.083..0.083 rows=559 loops=1)
Index Cond: (completed_at > '2024-01-10 13:08:58.25799'::timestamp without time zone)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_rating (cost=0.00..84.67 rows=7518 width=0) (actual time=0.314..0.314 rows=7531 loops=1)
Index Cond: (rating <= 3)
-> Index Scan using trip_requests_pkey on trip_requests (cost=0.29..7.19 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.007..0.007 rows=1 loops=78)
Index Cond: (id = trips.trip_request_id)
-> Index Scan using users_pkey on users riders (cost=0.29..0.34 rows=1 width=21) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=1 loops=78)
Index Cond: (id = trip_requests.rider_id)
-> Memoize (cost=0.30..6.55 rows=1 width=21) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=1 loops=78)
Cache Key: trips.driver_id
Cache Mode: logical
Hits: 8 Misses: 70 Evictions: 0 Overflows: 0 Memory Usage: 9kB
-> Index Scan using users_pkey on users drivers (cost=0.29..6.54 rows=1 width=21) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=1 loops=70)
Index Cond: (id = trips.driver_id)
Planning Time: 1.168 ms
Execution Time: 2.360 msThis time the query execution time is just over 2ms, a significant improvement over the previous ~20ms. This is due to the additional filter condition (rating <= 3) that reduces the number of rows that need to be processed in join operations:
Execution Time: 2.360 msThe BitmapAnd operation shows that both the indexes on completed_at and rating are being used. This operation combines bitmaps generated by Bitmap Index Scans, allowing information from more than one index to be quickly aggregated together.
-> BitmapAnd (cost=97.01..97.01 rows=75 width=0) (actual time=0.419..0.421 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_completed_at (cost=0.00..12.05 rows=501 width=0) (actual time=0.083..0.083 rows=559 loops=1)
Index Cond: (completed_at > '2024-01-10 13:08:58.25799'::timestamp without time zone)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_trips_on_rating (cost=0.00..84.67 rows=7518 width=0) (actual time=0.314..0.314 rows=7531 loops=1)
Index Cond: (rating <= 3)Visualize Query Plan
Understanding query plans can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex queries. However, there's a free web-based tool that can help make sense of them: explain.dalibo.com. Here's how to use it.
Prepare Your Query: Start by putting your query into a file. For instance, you can create a directory called queries and save your SQL query in a file within it. In addition to the ANALYZE argument that we've been using, also pass in COSTS, VERBOSE, BUFFERS, FORMAT JSON to EXPLAIN as shown below. This will include additional information in the query plan output, such as the amount of disk data that was fetched, and format the results as JSON:
-- queries/recently_completed_trips.sql
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, COSTS, VERBOSE, BUFFERS, FORMAT JSON) SELECT
trips.completed_at,
trips.rating,
locations.address,
drivers.first_name || ' ' || drivers.last_name AS driver_name,
riders.first_name || ' ' || riders.last_name AS rider_name
FROM trips
INNER JOIN trip_requests ON trip_requests.id = trips.trip_request_id
INNER JOIN locations ON locations.id = trip_requests.start_location_id
INNER JOIN users AS riders ON riders.id = trip_requests.rider_id
INNER JOIN users AS drivers ON drivers.id = trips.driver_id
WHERE (trips.completed_at > '2024-01-10 13:08:58.257990')
AND (trips.rating <= 3);Run the Query: Execute the query from your terminal using psql, ensuring to redirect the output to a file. The -XqAt flags make the output machine-readable:
psql -h 127.0.0.1 \
-p 5432 -U owner \
-d rideshare_development \
-XqAt -f queries/recently_completed_trips.sql > queries/fifth.json
# copy the contents of `queries/recently_completed_trips.json`Visualize Your Plan: Visit explain.dalibo.com and paste the generated plan text and query. Then, hit Submit. The tool will generate a visualization of your query plan. Here's an example of the visualization for the fifth attempt version of the query from this post. It shows the different types of scans that were used and how the data gets combined. The duration of each operation is also shown:
You can also click on the down caret icon beside any node to get more details about that operation. For example, focusing on the Bitmap Index Scan for use of the rating index on the trips table:
With this tool, deciphering the details of PostgreSQL query plans becomes a little more approachable. Just be mindful that using it involves sharing your query and its plan publicly. If privacy is a concern regarding sharing your query and its plan publicly, consider using pgAdmin, an open-source administrative tool for PostgreSQL that you can install on your local machine, which also offers a visualization feature for query plans.
Conclusion
This post has covered techniques to enhance PostgreSQL query performance in Rails applications. We began by examining a query execution plan using the EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) feature to understand how PostgreSQL processes queries. We then explored indexing, covering the addition of an index for performance improvements and how to do so without causing downtime or table locking.
Further into query optimization, we discussed the importance of careful column selection in the SELECT statement, demonstrating how narrowing down the retrieved data can improve performance. We then covered aligning database queries with business needs, illustrating how additional filters can reduce the number of processed rows and enhance scalability. Finally we learned how to visualize query plans with a free web-based tool. These strategies provide developers with the tools to create efficient and resilient Rails applications with PostgreSQL.
